More Cutting the Crap: Humanae Vitae | Barnhardt.Biz

ADULT CONCEPTS DISCUSSED BLUNTLY HEREIN.  No innocent children, and you probably ought to put out the cat, just to be safe.

The thoroughly on fleek Diane Montagna, the new go-to source for breaking news in Rome, broke the news last week that Antipope Bergoglio’s Freemasonic-sodomite henchmen have officially declared contraception to be not just morally licit, but “required” in some circumstances, specifically citing Antipope Bergoglio’s satanic screed, Amoris Latitiae (“the exuberance of sodomy“) as the justification.

Some people are puzzled as to why Antipope Bergoglio is going after Humanae Vitae and the whole contraception issue when the only people left who assent to and follow the Church’s infallible teaching on contraception as being mortally sinful always and everywhere are a microscopic handful of Traditional Catholics that are openly derided as insane and as bad or worse than the Taliban.  The number of even so-called “conservative” Novus Ordo Catholics that are sound on the question of contraception is so minuscule as to be justly described as “epsilon above zero”.  98 % of “catholics” today contracept or did contracept during their fertile years, and openly reject the notion that contraception is sinful.  Many were EXPLICITLY TOLD by priests, oftentimes in the Sacrament of Confession, that contraception was not sinful, that “Rome is wrong”, and that it is a “matter of conscience”.

At this point, it bears reminding one and all that the motto and creed of satanism is “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.”  You do realize that this is EXACTLY what Antipope Bergoglio’s entire satanic anti-church is built upon, yes?  The primacy of individual conscience? The explicit denial of objective good, objective truth and the denial of objective moral norms?  It is nothing less than the deification of man, which is the entire premise of Freemasonry, and which inevitably leads first to atheism, and then finally to the worship of satan.  Have I not said over and over again that not only has the Church been infiltrated by Freemasons, but that there are actual, real satanists inside the Vatican today?  I’m really, really not kidding, folks.

At this point, let me quote from a fine piece (notwithstanding the fact that it calls Antipope Bergoglio “Pope Francis”), that really goes to the crux of the matter:

Catholics who are open to the redefinition of “mercy” to mean the conscience is the supreme tribunal may cease to be Christians because they deny that the Incarnate God-man Jesus Christ died to save us from our sins… The conscience as supreme tribunal denies mercy because if there is no objective sin to be forgiven and one doesn’t have by grace the power to overcome sin then the cross of Christ is emptied of its power.

The entire premise of Antipope Bergoglio’s wretched usurpation is the elevation of the individual conscience as the supreme arbiter of morality and truth, and the determinative standard of good and evil. Man is “god”.  “god” is man. Folks, this is Freemasonry.  This is atheism. This is satanism.  “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.” Quoting Antipope Bergoglio now in his second interview with the atheist Freemason Italian newspaper magnate Eugenio Scalfari from October 1, ARSH 2013:

Antipope Bergoglio: “Each of us has a vision of good and of evil. We have to encourage people to move towards what they think is Good.”
Scalfari: Your Holiness (sic), you wrote that in your letter to me. The conscience is autonomous, you said, and everyone must obey his conscience. I think that’s one of the most courageous steps taken by a Pope (sic).
Antipope Bergoglio: “And I repeat it here. Everyone has his own idea of good and evil and must choose to follow the good and fight evil as he conceives them. That would be enough to make the world a better place.”

Now, several points, some of them reminders, about Humanae Vitae and contraception specifically.

Point #1:  Paul VI Montini DID NOT WRITE the passages in Humanae Vitae that reiterated the Church’s consistent teaching on contraception, and prophesied the cultural fallout of contraception – Cardinal Ottaviani wrote those parts.

Paul VI Montini was a sodomite and a Communist sympathizer.  At this point, I would refer you to Randy Engle’s chapter on Paul VI from her book “Rite of Sodomy”, recently re-published over at akaCatholic.  Paul VI had promised his Freemasonic-Communist-Sodomite circle that Humanae Vitae would “open the door” to contraception (sound familiar? just as Amoris Laetitia “opened the door” to “divorce and re-marriage”), and Paul VI Montini did in fact write Humanae Vitae to do exactly that.  However, when Montini’s draft was sent to the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (previously called The Holy Office, and before that the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition) and Cardinal Ottaviani, who was the head of the CDF at that time, saw it, Cardinal Ottaviani immediately excised Montini’s attempt at “opening the door” to contraception, and Ottaviani himself wrote the passages that are so widely quoted today, reaffirming The Church’s consistent teaching on contraception as ALWAYS MORTALLY SINFUL, and the logical corollaries regarding how contraception would utterly destroy marriage and the family, which are now frequently described as “prophetic”.  Thomistic scholars in Rome testify that the parts of Humanae Vitae written by Cardinal Ottaviani stick out like a sore thumb, precisely because they are written in the Thomistic style.  Paul VI Montini was, of course, rabidly anti-Thomistic.  Most arch-heretics hate St. Thomas Aquinas precisely because they hate any clear, logical, reasoned thought, and beyond that hate Thomas’ precise, direct, succinct writing, because one of the major tactics of the enemies of Christ and His Church is ambiguity, imprecision, nebulousness, double-speak and internal contradiction.  These coupled with intense verbosity, making documents incredibly long and meandering, is designed to prey upon intellectual lightweights that are impressed by “how thick a book is”, and Beta Diabolical Narcissists who are delighted to declare the Naked Emperor to be wearing the most beautiful, deep, profound clothes ever made, so long as it guarantees their paycheck, career advancement, and standing invitation to all the right dinner parties, with all the wittiest sodomites and well-connected gutter slags.

So, Cardinal Ottaviani re-writes Humanae Vitae, and Paul VI promulgates it.  All of Montini’s Freemason-Communist-sodomite buddies were shocked, betrayed and INFURIATED, because Paul VI Montini had promised all of them for years that HV would open the door to contraception.

At this point, I would like to point out, in case the thought hasn’t already occurred to you, that this sure does look like an example of the negative protection of Papal Infallibility as dogmatically defined at Vatican I.  Pope Paul VI, an awful, awful man, but still the Pope, wildly illicit though he was, attempted to promulgate heresy, and was thwarted.  Two points about today’s situation clearly follow from this: first, clearly we have a confirming proof-set that Antipope Bergoglio is not the Pope because he has promulgated heresy – but remember, this is only a CONFIRMATION of the fact that Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger’s attempted abdication was made in SUBSTANTIAL ERROR, almost certainly as a result of unjustly inflicted grave fear per Canon 188, and was invalid by the law itself, and thus Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger is now and has been all along the one and only living pope.  This is really, really crucial folks.  BERGOGLIO’S HERESY IS NOT GERMANE TO THE QUESTION.  The only thing that Bergoglio’s heresy does, which at this point is so severe that whether or not this foul wretch of a man can even be called “quasi-Christian”, much less Catholic is openly questioned, is to give us a secondary proof-set that Bergoglio is not the Pope, NOT THAT HE WAS POPE AND AT SOME POINT CEASED TO BE POPE.  THAT IS FALSE.  BERGOGLIO WAS NEVER THE POPE. NOT FOR ONE SECOND.

We have to be sound on this question, folks, because if Bergoglio dies or “resigns” and Pope Benedict XVI is still alive, the subsequent conclave that is called will be A FALSE CONCLAVE EXACTLY LIKE THE CONCLAVE OF ARSH 2013, AND THUS ANOTHER ANTIPOPE WILL BE NAMED. It is so monumentally crucial that people stop pushing the idea that Bergoglio’s heresy has anything to do with WHO THE POPE IS.  If on the off-chance Bergoglio were to be removed due to heresy, what would the result be?  Because the base premise is false, namely that Bergoglio ever was the Pope, the result would be the calling of another faux-conclave, and the “election” of another Antipope.

The second thing we see from the events surrounding the promulgation of Humanae Vitae is the “lesson learned” by the enemies of Christ and His Holy Church, and is why the CDF today is completely ignored by the Antipope Bergoglio regime.  These filthy fags are terrified that what happened to Paul VI with Humanae Vitae will happen to them.  It has nothing to do with Papal Infallibility, because Bergoglio isn’t the Pope, AND none of these arch-heretics believe in anything supernatural, even if they do believe that Bergoglio is the Vicar of Christ, or that there is any such thing as “The Vicar of Christ”. I suspect all these execrable men believe in is earthly political power, which Antipope Bergoglio has illegitimately. The notion of “supernatural negative protection of the Petrine See by the Holy Ghost” is a punchline to these monsters – even though we can see it in action right in front of us every day as Pope Benedict XVI sits in silence, while an Antipope works to utterly destroy The Church Militant and overthrow the the very idea of objective truth and objective moral norms.  It was widely reported that the CDF, then under the control of the recently-fired Cardinal Mueller, a rapacious ladder-climber if ever there was one, sent FORTY PAGES of notes and corrections on Amoris Laetitia – which didn’t even cover the entirety of the text – to Casa Santa Marta (Bergoglio’s luxury hotel residence / lovenest), and were completely ignored. Oh, yes.  Some of the older faggot infiltrators, like the odious Cardinal Kasper of Germany, are still stinging from the “Montini betrayal” half a century ago.

Point #2: Why do Antipope Bergoglio and the rest of the sodomite infiltrators care about contraception, and why is Humanae Vitae a priority?

I’m glad to see that quite a few people know the answer to this question, but there are still lots of people who don’t get it.  And here is where the conversation is going to become very adult in nature.  What this entire Humanae Vitae thing is about in the minds of Antipope Bergoglio and his faggot accomplices is NOT contraception.  As stated earlier, the vast, vast, vast majority of “practicing catholics” do now or did contracept without shame or compunction, and sacrilegiously receive Holy Communion while in mortal sin, totally unrepentant and intransigent.  That horse left the barn 45 years ago.  What this whole drive to ratify contraception has to do with is SODOMY.  Here’s why, and now’s the time to put out the cat.

When a man and wife contracept, be it chemically (Pill, injection, implant, spermacide – anything) or mechanically (tubal ligation, vasectomy, IUD, diaphragm – anything), what that does is reduce the chaste marital act into a mortally sinful unchaste act whereby the spouses are using each other to masturbate.  If you intentionally frustrate the possibility of transmission of life in the marital act, it becomes a mortally sinful act under the category of sodomy, specifically under the sub-category of Onanism, that is, masturbation. Masturbation is also referred to as the sin of Onan, or Onanism, from Genesis 38in which Juda’s son Onan “spills his seed”, specifically by withdrawl, and is slain by God for his “detestable” sin.  So while Onanism is commonly used to refer to solitary masturbation, the actual event from which the term derives is a man having vaginal sex with his wife, and “pulling out” before ejaculation.

At this point, it also bears mentioning what I have heard referred to as “Catholic sex”, which is “dry humping”, wherein the man never penetrates the woman.  Make no mistake, this is every bit as much fornication and mortal sin as any other form of fornication.  There is ZERO mitigation because of non-penetration, and anyone who says otherwise is totally, completely kidding themselves.  If anything, this sort of attempt at legalism and “gaming the system” betrays a deviousness and wickedness that could possibly make the sin even more severe. The very fact that there are people who refer to “dry humping” as “Catholic sex” exposes this wicked, legalistic mindset.  But, that is, of course for Christ alone to judge.

So, what the faggots figured out long, long ago – long before Humanae Vitae – was that if Onanistic Sodomy, that is contracepted vaginal sex between man and wife, could be given approval, then there would be no way to argue against same-sex sodomy, because one man using another man’s rectal vault or mouth as the point of masturbatory friction is, in essence, exactly the same thing as a husband using his chemically sterilized wife’s vagina as his point of masturbatory friction.

What’s good for the Breeders is good for the fags and the dykes.

That’s right, I said it, and I meant it, and I’ll repeat it again, just to make sure that no one misses it:

EVERY INSTANCE of vaginal intercourse between a man and wife wherein either person has been rendered intentionally sterile, is in exactly the same category of grave mortal sin as two men engaging in anal or oral sodomy.

I shake my head, looking back at people I have known back in the day, good, solid “Christian conservatives”, that ranted and raved and shook their fists at the faggots, while pumping the Pill into their wives or themselves.  A woman who was naturally fertile for 25 years of married life, and had, say, three children, but was on the Pill for the entire marriage except for the few months preceding the “planned” pregnancies, and during the pregnancies, would have been engaging in Onanistic sodomy along with her husband at EVERY INSTANCE of the marital act for roughly 22 years.  That is, on average, THOUSANDS of acts of mortal sin per couple.

And so, if The Church can be made to APPEAR to have ratified contraception by an Antipope, it will also be made to APPEAR to have ratified EVERY FORM OF SODOMY by extension, and that, folks, is what they’re after.  This is a textbook example of a logical truth table built upon a false premise, with the base false premise yielding corollary outputs which APPEAR or are ARGUED to be true, but are in fact, false. The base premise MUST be true, and what Antipope Bergoglio and his wretched claque of faggots are going after with Humanae Vitae is THE BASE PREMISE ITSELF, so that they might present the world with a truth table that appears to ratify sodomy.


Are we crystal, crystal clear?

And unless a person repents of the mortal sin of contraception, ceases it, and confesses it with a firm, sincere intention to never do it again, it is going to be spectacularly difficult to reach the Beatific Vision, and that insincere and/or unrepentant sacramental confession and any subsequent receptions of Holy Communion will be acts of sacrilege.

For those who have mutilated their bodies through tubal ligation or vasectomy, having those procedures reversed will be required if the spouses wish to resume the marital act.  Otherwise, the couple should live in perfect continence until the wife is naturally infertile, and thus the couple is not frustrating the possibility for the transmission of life.  Having said that, it might not be a bad idea for a couple to commit to permanent continence IN REPARATION FOR THEIR YEARS OF MORTAL SIN, AND ANY SACRILEGIOUS COMMUNIONS THEY MIGHT HAVE MADE.  Kind of a gut-check about what, exactly, loving your spouse really means, and what loving Jesus Christ really means, huh?  But, obviously, an orthodox, believing Catholic priest should be consulted.  Don’t just take my word for it.

Do you appreciate now how terrifyingly complete satan’s grip on the world is?  Do you now see why it is that any clear-thinking person is terror-struck by the Fewness of the Saved?  Do you now see what an unprecedentedly and unfathomably low point The Church is at when people like me have to explain these things?  I used to be a commodity broker.  I used to teach Cattle Marketing schools.  All I can say is:

I hope and pray that this helps someone.

Christ, have mercy on us.

“In this supreme moment of need of the Church, the one who should speak will fall silent.” –Our Lady of Good Success

Pray for the Pope, Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger.